October 25, 2016
Hillary Clinton is dangerous. She supports the Iran deal, has surrounded herself with advisers hostile to Israel, and is pushing for more global governance.
Hillary Clinton’s road to serfdom
By David Semple
The British example
For young people born at the end of the 20th century, life in the West promises nothing but uncertainty, rising crime rates, overpriced education, the clash of irreconcilable cultures within our cities as the modern nation state is destroyed by a corrupt ruling elite dedicated to increasing the power of the state (just to repair the self-inflicted damage unleashed by the incompetent economic and social policies of most Western governments).
Following the 1997 General Election in Britain, Tony Blair and the New Labour cabinet made a conscious decision to destroy the inner cities of Britain by putting in place a new policy of mass inward immigration on a scale never seen in the history of this country. There is no such thing as “community” in 21st century Britain, only a hostile urban landscape made up of different communities with contradictory values that will never, and can never, build bridges between each other.
The UK has imported the racism, the conflicts and the hatreds of the new countries created after the fall of the British Empire. Because the Leftist British establishment is now fully hostile to British identity, an identity that used to absorb immigrants into the melting pot, now no longer exists. Immigrants come to the UK and are taught by academics and teachers to hate and mistrust their new country.
This is the legacy of New Labour. It is the legacy of rising Marxist ideologies at British universities. This is the legacy of mass inward immigration on a scale never before witnessed in history of the British Isles. If the Anglo-Saxon invasions created England out of a primitive Celtic backwater, the British Left’s surrender of British sovereignty to an influx of people who despise the freedoms upon which the country was built, will only serve to replace cultural stability with inter-cultural conflict.
The destruction of Britain by a rising tide of anti-British hatred from within this country can be traced back to the Suez Crisis of 1956. Suez completely destroyed the self-confidence of the British establishment. The military action taken by the British government, to invade Egypt in order to overthrow the Muslim tyranny of Arab supremacist President Nasser, was morally and politically the correct thing to do. The action taken by the American government of President Eisenhower, to turn against its British, French and Israeli allies, was an act of betrayal. After Suez, the British establishment lost faith in Britain and decided to join the “ever closer union” of the European Economic Community. This was an act of national suicide. This year, the British people found an escape route out of the European Union. Post-Brexit Britain, however, may struggle to retain its freedoms as the change in demographics caused by mass immigration forever buries the country’s Judeo-Christian identity.
Mrs Clinton’s road to serfdom
What does this have to do with Hillary Clinton? In short, everything.
Just as the Suez Crisis of 1956 destroyed the self-confidence of the British Establishment, a short eleven years after the nation’s victory in World War Two, so the Iraq War of 2003, just fourteen years after the fall of the Berlin Wall, has destroyed the self-confidence of the American establishment. Mrs Clinton does not believe in nation states. She despises the Anglo-Saxon freedoms and Judeo-Christian identity which created the American Dream. She is a product of the New Left. Like Harold Macmillan in the late 1950s, Hillary Clinton no longer believes in her own country, the United States of America. She no longer believes in the American Dream.
Mrs Clinton wants to replace the Republic with an Empire. But she does not want to replace the great American Republic with an empire governed under the principles of the Constitution of the United States of America, the greatest political document in the history of mankind, the only founding constitution which withholds powers not granted to the American Governments, whether Federal or State Governments, to the people of the United States. Like the signatories of the Treaty of Rome in 1957, Hillary Clinton wants supra-national law to reign over the laws of the United States. That’s why she believes in international treaties like the Trans-Pacific Partnership, the North American Union, NAFTA, TTIP and the creation of a new union of the Americas.
Like the Europeans of the 18th century, like the founding fathers of the European Union, Mrs Clinton despises the independent nation state. The European Union destroyed the sovereignty of the new nation states which emerged from the collapse of the Russian, Austrian, Ottoman and German Empires. The Europeans have for centuries despised the freedoms and liberties of the United States. So does Mrs Clinton. She wants to destroy the sovereignty of United States in the same way that Harold Macmillan and Edward Heath wanted to destroy the sovereignty of the United Kingdom.
Mrs Clinton wants to follow in the path of the Romans who turned the great Roman Republic into an Empire. But not an Empire ruled by Washington DC. Rather, an Empire looking to create global governance. Like Barack Obama, Mrs Clinton has little time for American national identity or Judeo-Christian civilization. That’s why she wants to use Muslim and Hispanic inward immigration to change the demography of the United States. The true political vision of Hillary Clinton was revealed in a paid speech to Brazil-based Banco Itau three years ago, recently released by WikiLeaks, where she admitted her desire for the entire Western hemisphere to have no borders, favoring open trade and a single economy:
“My dream is a hemispheric common market, with open trade and open borders, some time in the future with energy that is as green and sustainable as we can get it, powering growth and opportunity for every person in the hemisphere.”
Mrs Clinton, however, is not happy with the world order on which American, British and Israeli freedoms are built. She wants global governance. Mrs Clinton, along with President Obama, warned the British people not to vote to leave the European Union. And the British people told them where to go. President Obama and Mrs Clinton are always telling the Israeli government not to build Jewish houses in Jerusalem and Judea. Israeli governments have continued to tell them where to go. Mrs Clinton is now telling the American people that the United States must make way for global governance. Will the American people copy the British and Israeli example and tell her where to go?
If Hillary Clinton enters the White House on 20th January 2017, she will become dangerous to the people of United States. Global governance has not, and never will, deliver prosperity and freedom. On the contrary, by empowering the state over the individual, Mrs Clinton’s rule will inevitably lead to a society of coercion, a loss of freedom, an oppressive society and the serfdom of the individual. Indeed, the individual will become a mere means used by her and her central planners in the service of such abstractions as “social welfare,” “climate,” and “the environment.”
Political advisers and antisemitism
Then there are her political advisers. Huma Abedin, Mrs Clinton’s top aide, is the daughter of an Islamic extremist and has family members who belong the infamous Muslim Brotherhood. Abedin spent more than a decade as assistant editor of the Journal of Minority Muslim Affairs, which has been accused of spreading antisemitism. One article, which was published during her tenure, accuses Jews of “working the American political system” and being aided by the “memory of the Holocaust.”
One of Hillary Clinton’s closest advisers is Sydney Blumenthal, whose nickname is “Sid Vicious.” He was the originator of the Obama “birther” scandal and senior adviser to President Bill Clinton from 1997 to 2001. Obama’s chief of staff, Rahm Emanuel, refused to let Mrs Clinton appoint him to her team at the State Department in 2009. Blumenthal has dirty hands in many of the Clinton family scandals, including Benghazi. He is not a supporter of Israel.
Sidney’s son, Max Blumenthal, is an infamous self-hating Jew and anti-Israel activist who supports Hamas and the genocidal BDS movement, both of which want to remove Israel from the map of the Middle East. His books on Israel, including Goliath are filled with anti-Zionist propaganda, lies and comparisons between Israel and Nazi Germany.
Sidney Blumenthal has not only failed to condemn his son’s anti-Israel writings, but he has advocated for and defended the toxic ideas that poison Max’s writings. Mrs Clinton valued the writings of Max Blumenthal so much during her term as Secretary of State, that she agreed to pay Sidney Blumenthal $120,000 each year to keep this information flowing. One article wherein Max compared Dutch politician Geert Wilders’ views with those of Israelis, included the words, “They richly enjoy when Israel mows down Arab Muslims by the dozens and tells the world to go to hell; they admire Israel’s settler culture.” Blumenthal concluded with the words, “The end-game of the far-right is to make Europe less tolerant and more Israeli.” Mrs Clinton responded to this racist anti-Israel propaganda by writing, “A very smart piece – as usual”.
This is Hillary Clinton, who thinks that the so-called West Bank region of Judea and Samaria should be a Jew-free land, a pure Arab Palestinian state which is “Judenfrei.” If this subtle anti-Jewish racism of Mrs Clinton’s is unacceptable to the Jewish people, who live in a multicultural state alongside millions of Arabs, then it should also be unacceptable to the American people and liberals throughout the world. Mrs Clinton lies when she says she is a supporter of Israel. She promotes anti-Jewish Arab supremacism by condemning Jewish settlements in Judea. Yet, Mrs Clinton advocates mass Arab immigration into the United States. Whose side is she on? Remember, the Saudis are donors to the Clinton Foundation. Surely this is a conflict of interest for a politician who purports to promote peace between Israel and the Arabs.
Iran and Donald Trump
On a final note, it is worth recalling that Mrs Clinton supported, and still supports, Obama’s Iran Deal. Iran is still threatening to destroy Israel. Hillary Clinton, who opposes the building of Jewish homes in Jerusalem and Judea, supports the treacherous act of appeasing the Mullocracy in Iran, a regime which threatens to destroy Israel. The appeasers who signed the Iran Deal are falling like dominoes. David Cameron’s career ended in failure. Obama is retiring. Hollande and Merkel look like losers at the polls next year. That will leave only Putin, the Chinese President and the leaders of the European Union standing as appeasers of Iran.
By contrast, Donald Trump opposes the Iran Deal. Indeed, he is the only Western political leader outside Israel who is actively opposing Obama’s Iran Deal. Mrs Clinton, meanwhile, is buried in the quicksand of appeasement of Iran and Sunni terrorist groups in Syria. Mrs Clinton supports giving the Islamic Republic of Iran over a hundred billion dollars so the Mullahs can fund their terrorism in the Middle East and around the world.
So the question is: Will the American public elect Mrs Clinton – a corrupt, power-hungry appeaser who is surrounded by advisers of dubious character – to become the 45th President of the United States? Or will they vote for Donald Trump, who, although far from faultless, is not in thrall to Tehran or the Sunni Islamists? We will know the answer very soon.